He claims that HBD bloggers and intellectuals lack emotional intelligence.
I remember him also writing something about pulling funds out of Africa because blacks weren’t smart enough to ever be independent. I’m not sure how he would know this.
The main thrust of his argument is that the only possible reason why anyone would consider such a thing as human neurological diversity as truth is because they are full of hate. Therefore, a belief in HBD necessarily entails a low EQ. For him, human biodiversity can never be true. This is why it is pointless to argue with him, as I demonstrated with an experimental personal comment about his family, he fails to examine reality objectively, and instead relies on emotion. Which is coincidentally why he would probably consider himself as someone who has high EQ. From what I understand, what a high EQ means for Byron Wrong is simply a high consideration of other people's feelings.
What does this kind of worldview look like? It means that anything that causes emotional harm to any group of human beings or individual can never be true, because a characteristic of truth is love. Therefore a scientific claim like Satoshi Kanazawa's study that provided evidence behind the lesser attractiveness of black women is false on the basis of it being offensive to black women (his methodology was suspect, true, but this does not detract from my main point, no study has been done that I know of which demonstrates the equality of beauty across races).
And I don't see any problem with Half Sigma stating that Herman Cain sounds stupid and low-class. Half Sigma, more than anyone, probably has done the research on Cain's credentials and probably came to the conclusion that Cain is pretty damn smart. But the claim here is that he sounds stupid, not that he is stupid. Cain is just much smarter than he looks/sound. Is it really that offensive to note that Cain sounds stupid?
The idea of HBD causes human harm to NAMs, therefore it must be evil.
And why does Byron Wrong keep insisting that HBD people vouch for the inferiority of Asians? If anything, they believe Asians to be superior.
My position on the whole IR deal, specifically in regards to the plight of Asian males, is that the American social structure gives white males higher status which leads to the IR disparity. I feel that the majority of people are in general, only sexually attracted to those of the same race as themselves. But on the very margins of interracial relationships, biological differences would give the edge to white males over Asian males. Ideally, 90% of Asian Males would be married to Asian Females and about a 1/3 ratio with AF/WM having the advantage over AM/WF. In my opinion, there is too much miscegenation going on these days...